View Full Version : Which Receiver?
I am considering the Denon 4310($1,600 on sale), the Marantz 6004
($1,249) and NAD 747 ($1,299). If anyone can shed some light on any of
these receivers I would appreciate it.
Thanks in Advance
RM
cjdaytonjrnospam@cox.net
21-12-2009, 10:05 AM
RD50 <rmdd86@comcast.net> wrote:
> I am considering the Denon 4310($1,600 on sale), the Marantz 6004
> ($1,249) and NAD 747 ($1,299). If anyone can shed some light on any of
> these receivers I would appreciate it.
>
> Thanks in Advance
>
> RM
The Denon is a very good product, you couldn't give me the Marantz.
The NAD is the best unit of the three, but depending on the speakers
you have, it might not make much difference. Which unit best fits
what you want it to do?
Chip
--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB
On Dec 20, 3:41*pm, cjdaytonjrnos...@cox.net wrote:
> RD50 <rmd...@comcast.net> wrote:
> > I am considering the Denon 4310($1,600 on sale), the Marantz 6004
> > ($1,249) and NAD 747 ($1,299). If anyone can shed some light on any of
> > these receivers I would appreciate it.
>
> > Thanks in Advance
>
> > RM
>
> The Denon is a very good product, you couldn't give me the Marantz.
> The NAD is the best unit of the three, but depending on the speakers
> you have, it might not make much difference. Which unit best fits
> what you want it to do?
>
> Chip
>
> --
> --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------
> Usenet Newsgroup Service * * * * * * * * * * * *$9.95/Month 30GB
My front speakers are Paradigm Studio 100 V5. I will probably only be
using five channels and one sub. I will be using it for music about
75% of the time. Music is more important to me than HT. Do you still
recommend the NAD?
Thanks
Thanks
cjdaytonjrnospam@cox.net
21-12-2009, 10:48 AM
RD50 <rmdd86@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Dec 20, 3:41=A0pm, cjdaytonjrnos...@cox.net wrote:
> > RD50 <rmd...@comcast.net> wrote:
> > > I am considering the Denon 4310($1,600 on sale), the Marantz 6004
> > > ($1,249) and NAD 747 ($1,299). If anyone can shed some light on any
> > > of these receivers I would appreciate it.
> >
> > > Thanks in Advance
> >
> > > RM
> >
> > The Denon is a very good product, you couldn't give me the Marantz.
> > The NAD is the best unit of the three, but depending on the speakers
> > you have, it might not make much difference. Which unit best fits
> > what you want it to do?
> >
> > Chip
> >
> > --
> > --------------------http://NewsReader.Com/--------------------
> > Usenet Newsgroup Service =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0
> > =A0$=
> 9.95/Month 30GB
>
> My front speakers are Paradigm Studio 100 V5. I will probably only be
> using five channels and one sub. I will be using it for music about
> 75% of the time. Music is more important to me than HT. Do you still
> recommend the NAD?
>
> Thanks
>
> Thanks
Yes, absolutely! Like I said, that depends on your needs.
NAD makes a very solid product. BTW, nice choice for speakers.
Chip
--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB
vBulletin® v3.7.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.