PDA

View Full Version : which plasma would you choose and why?


JC
16-06-2005, 08:51 PM
Ok i know the answer may be obvious but here is my situation:

I have a samsung 50" model : P50XHAS which is about 1.5 years old
now......this is for personal use...
this week i needed to buy a 50" plasma and bought the new samsung HD
PS50P4H.

For those of you out there that are in the know would you keep the fujitsu @
home or would the samsung be better?

I am not sure wether to choose the new plasma or stick to the older one...
what would you do
many thanks
jc

ps: reasons would be good too:)

scalpel
17-06-2005, 09:29 PM
Cant you just connect them up to the same inputs and make the comparison
yourself - rather than making us all jealous that you have 2 screens.

BTW - isn't the "50 model : P50XHAS" actually a fujitsu??


--
scalpel

JC
17-06-2005, 09:29 PM
indeed you r rite...sorry yes it is a fujitsu..the new one is the samsung
thanks
jc
"scalpel" <scalpel.1qrp31@no-mx.forums.eyo.com.au> wrote in message
news:scalpel.1qrp31@no-mx.forums.eyo.com.au...
>
> Cant you just connect them up to the same inputs and make the comparison
> yourself - rather than making us all jealous that you have 2 screens.
>
> BTW - isn't the "50 model : P50XHAS" actually a fujitsu??
>
>
> --
> scalpel

bassett
18-06-2005, 01:21 PM
is there any comparison between the two, I would think the fujitsu, would
be head and shoulders above everything else in the plasma market.
bassett


"JC" <jc@jc.com> wrote in message
news:bJcse.18510$F7.1103@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> Ok i know the answer may be obvious but here is my situation:
>
> I have a samsung 50" model : P50XHAS which is about 1.5 years old
> now......this is for personal use...
> this week i needed to buy a 50" plasma and bought the new samsung HD
> PS50P4H.
>
> For those of you out there that are in the know would you keep the fujitsu
> @
> home or would the samsung be better?
>
> I am not sure wether to choose the new plasma or stick to the older one...
> what would you do
> many thanks
> jc
>
> ps: reasons would be good too:)
>
>