Re: Plasma versus LCD longevity - Plasma wins

[Trevor Wilson]

"DAVO" <davideo@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cjQZd.235$C7.32@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> "Andrew Reilly" <andrew-newspost@areilly.bpc-users.org> wrote in message
> news:pan.2005.03.09.03.04.26.467927@areilly.bpc-users.org...
>> On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 03:11:52 +0000, Trevor_S wrote:
>>
>> Looking forward to being disabused of this notion :-)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> --
>> Andrew
>>
>
> It appears that most arguments against LCD are based on old technology.
> LCD
> screens of even 3 years ago were nothing compared to the current models.
> They are improving all the time. Sony has made the announcement it will
> move
> away from Plasma displays and concentrate on the LCD technology. Surely
> this
> tells you Plasma is dead and LCD lives on.

**No. It merely tells us that LCD is more profitable (for now). Roll on
O-LED.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

[DAVO]

D technology. Surely
> > this
> > tells you Plasma is dead and LCD lives on.
>
> **No. It merely tells us that LCD is more profitable (for now). Roll on
> O-LED.
>
>
> --
> Trevor Wilson
> www.rageaudio.com.au

I don't think so Trev......have a look at the wholesale prices of both
Plasma and LCD and see if that changes your mind!
I would further predict you won't be able to buy a new Plasma set within 5
years.

DAVO